Feature Story


The right kind of coach

 

By Kim McCullough, MSc, YCS

 

Concerned hockey parents will often ask me whether their daughter should tryout for a different team so that they can be exposed to a “different kind of coach.” They are concerned that their daughter isn’t flourishing under their current coach and wonder if they might be able to find a better fit. They might think that their daughter would improve more under a more strict coaching style or that they need a more nurturing type of coach. I always offer them my advice, but I find it really interesting that we put our coaches into the same little boxes that we put our players into.

We tend to categorize our players into the “defensive defensemen,” the “goal scorer” or the “playmaker.” We don’t necessarily confine our players to these descriptions, but quite often, those labels stick and persist far into their playing careers.

We do the exact same thing with coaches. You’ve got your “yeller,” your “systems coach” and your “skills coach.” And as much as I think it can be harmful to put our young players into a particular category of player, I think it is potentially more harmful to allow our coaches to be defined in such narrow terms. 

Coaching young hockey players, male or female, cannot be a “one size fits all” approach. Your players aren’t all the same, so why would you treat them all the same?

If you want to make sure that you address the individual needs of every player on your team, you have to adjust your communication style accordingly. Most of us coaches are stubborn and often fall back on the “my way or the highway” approach. I am as guilty as the next person of getting lazy and staying in my comfort zone.

The “one size fits all” approach is the easy way to coach a team.  Personalized coaching and communication is a lot of work. But it is absolutely essential to developing the most complete players possible. You can’t communicate with the highly motivated, highly skilled players on your team in the same way you communicate with the players with low motivation and high skill. They are going to respond completely differently. You have to take a completely different approach with a low skill, high motivation player than you would with a low skill, low motivation player.

Not every player on your team is going to respond to screaming and yelling. And some of your players will find the “cheerleader” approach, with constant positivity no matter what the situation, to be aggravating. I know I did. Some players need constant feedback after every shift, while some just want to be left alone. 

We all know that being a volunteer hockey coach is one of the most thankless jobs around. We get great personal satisfaction of seeing our players succeed on and off the ice, but there are ridiculous demands on our time and frequent attacks on our program and philosophy from concerned parents and frustrated players.

Now I am asking you to commit even more time and effort to being a better coach. As coaches, we have all made the commitment to help our players become better athletes and better people on and off the ice. Do not allow yourself to be defined by one style of coaching. Personalizing our communication for each and every athlete is a lot of work, but it is well worth it. 

 

To learn more about how to get to the next level of girls hockey performance, visit: http://www.totalfemalehockey.com. Kim McCullough, MSc, YCS, is an expert in the development of aspiring young hockey players. Kim’s player development websites give coaches and parents of young players access to programs, articles and advice on how to help their players take their game to the next level safely and effectively.

 

Let’s Play Hockey wants to publish your hockey stories. From tournament reports, to feature stories on teams, players or coaches, to opinion pieces on the game of hockey, Let’s Play Hockey accepts submissions from readers throughout the hockey community. To submit your hockey story and/or photo(s), e-mail us at editor@letsplayhockey.com.