Feature Story


Several small philosophy topics

 

Let’s Play Hockey Columnist

 

Every once in a while I like to write a column or two where I have a chance to discuss several unrelated things that have piled up on my idea list – but don’t individually warrant a whole column.

 

Coaching positional play

Coaches have a responsibility to make it very clear to their players what they expect them to do – what their responsibilities are in games. While that sounds pretty basic, I continue to see games where some defensemen (obviously) think that their forwards are not very good and that they (the D) are not really needed on defense.

The reason I think that is because these defensemen rush the puck 12 to 20 times a game. What is happening is that the coach has failed to properly define the defensemen’s roles and enforce them. Rushing occasionally when there is an advantage is part of that role.

I also see many forwards who make very little attempt to provide proper coverage on their own zone and are just waiting to go toward the other end. Again, coaches have failed to properly define what the forwards need to do in all areas of the ice.

I see it like a construction project (that’s my business). The specifications and changes are prepared by the coach (designer); the contractors (players) build based on the design; the inspectors (coaches) watch carefully to see that the work is being properly done according to design.

Coaching is not quite that simple (neither is construction) but if coaches approached player responsibilities kind of that way, the players and coaches would be much happier.

 

“Clicking up” the pace

One of the prime responsibilities of coaches during a game is to keep a close watch on the pulse – the pace of the game. Most games have pace changes several times – maybe even several times per period. The game picks up (by one team) and it must be matched quickly.

Anybody who has played for me will tell you that I call this “clicking up”; moving up a few notches. Sometimes (often) it means changing lines to see if one line will “jump up” and bring the other lines with them. The coach needs to truly tell the team when a click up is needed – and players need to learn, in games and in practices, what this means.

 

5-on-3 Power Plays

I don’t really want to spend time diagramming the 5-on-3 power play, but rather point out the really obvious items that make or break this excellent opportunity.

First, a team that tries to cycle around or pass among the three forwards down low or on the side are simply making the process a 3-on-3. Second, there is a very simple way to take advantage of 5-on-3 situations. That is by going outside, having one defenseman move toward the net with the puck (to draw one defender), then cross pass to the other defenseman for a quick shot or one-timer.  Then at the net is a 3-on-2 for rebounds/tips. A team ought to be able to move the puck and rotate it outside for this shot at least 4-5 times in a 5-on-3 power play.

 

Hockey is an individual and team sport

I believe coaches have to try to encourage (motivate) all the individual players on the team rather than spending too much time motivating the team. While hockey is a team sport and requires a team approach, it is each individual doing their job and maximizing their performance that creates the team success.

Every player is different and needs different handling, encouragement and motivation. Failing to deal with the individuals will leave some substantial percentage of players unprepared mentally and emotionally. It is much harder to keep track of the needs of 20 individuals than to generalize with the whole team. Much of the personal handling involves CONFIDENCE and FEELING GOOD about SELF.

 

Winners prepare to win

A number of years ago I cut an article out of the Minneapolis Star Tribune under their “Success Secrets” column by Mark McCormack. He was talking about winners and losers. The concept was that winners “set themselves up to win.” They don’t have excuses; they don’t let other things limit them. He gave a checklist of things that winners are:

• They’re well conditioned

• They’re well rested.

• They’re peaking at the right time.

• They’ve thought about and set a game plan.

• They’ve solved small nagging injuries.

 

Doing well isn’t lucky or just because of natural born talent. It is a result of preparation. Some athletes don’t realize this and move to good personal practices until they start feeling their age. The athletes that perform very well when they are young (Tiger Woods types) are very well prepared to perform well.

 

Speed, agility, strength

Most physiology gurus (training specialists) like our own Jack Blatherwick, will aggress that these three are the prime physical characteristics that make up top athletes, including hockey players. They would also agree that some athletes are born with more of each – so have a head start. At the same time, each of these can be created, within reason.

 

• Speed – I believe speed is very much a matter of effort. An average speed player that tries at 110 percent all the time will be faster than a fast player at 85-90 percent. If a player is fast and tries hard, then something special exists. There aren’t many of these – even skating full tilt all the way to the puck makes average players “fast”.

 

• Agility – This can be created because in hockey it has a lot to do with lower center of gravity. Agility, in turn, is created by training the (primarily) large quad and hamstring muscles. This gives more ability to move laterally and creates more weight low (lower center of gravity). Agility can also be improved with good plyometric training (jumping).

 

• Strength – This can be created by a good workout regimen – throughout the body. So, strength is a choice item by athletes. They can be stronger or weaker depending on how hard they want to work.

 

Looking at all three items; hard work is the basis of each – and athletes have a choice. Coaches can only encourage big effort on the ice and hard work in the gym. They can also make certain that the workout facility and good plan are available—and that practices are set up to push hard work concepts (fast pace).

 

John Russo, Ph.D., is founder and director of the Upper Midwest High School Elite League. He was a captain at the University of Wisconsin, and his Coaches’ Corner columns have appeared in LPH since 1986.