Feature Story
By Jack Blatherwick
Let’s Play Hockey Columnist
Imagine
an assembly line in
Are
we making a sports car? An SUV? A truck? No one
knows, so each employee just does his own thing. Even an auto-maker who can lose $12 billion in a year
couldn’t be that dumb. But development of young hockey players in the
The
final product in hockey should be very clear.
Just go to the NHL.com website, look at the leading scorers, and say to
the outside expert, “OK. I want my
son/daughter to be a Sidney Crosby or Vincent Lecavalier with Ovechkin-like
power — rink sense like Hossa and Thornton, with a shot like Heatley and quick-hands,
quick-feet, quick-mind like Savard or St. Louis.”
Or…
if you’re worth your salt as a personal trainer, please build a defenseman who
skates, thinks, and handles the puck like Scott Niedermeyer. We don’t need more examples; he’s the model.
Without
this guidance from the hockey community in our country, we’ve turned the
experts loose to do their own thing.
Some are into aerobic distance training, so their clients run around
lakes. Some are good at building strength,
and apparently believe that Crosby and Ovechkin look like nose tackles. Some prefer Pilates; others would like hockey
players to stand on balance boards and juggle medicine balls.
In
the last decade, “Core stability” has become fashionable, so it’s now a given
that so-called “functional” core exercises are absolutely essential before
someone can skate with speed and power.
Never mind that Bobby Orr was the speediest, most powerful skater in
history and never saw a core exercise with someone balanced atop a beach ball.
Actually,
the most up-to-date scientific research regarding core stability shows that
some of these core exercises might actually cause the injuries they were
intended to prevent. Stuart McGill is a professor of spine biomechanics and has
done extensive research on physiological characteristics of elite athletes as
well as patients with low back problems. McGill has published 200 scientific
articles and several books, the most recent cautioning that mis-use or
over-emphasis of these training concepts can be dangerous and would certainly
result in loss of athletic power (McGill, SM. Ultimate back fitness and performance:
Separating myth from fact. 2nd Edition. 2006).
That
is the point. Mis-use or over-emphasis of a training concept is not only
dangerous, but highly counterproductive in developing athletes. Please
understand, I believe that aerobic fitness, strength,
power, core stability, and (dynamic) balance are important pieces of a large
puzzle that represent the development of a young hockey player.
But
they are just pieces, and must be fit into an athletic, skillful package. Experts with no picture of the final product
might tend to over-emphasize their own area of expertise. Core exercises designed for middle-aged
patients with back problems might not be necessary for young kids involved in
athletic activities, if those athletic activities are also an excellent way to
develop core stability.
Aerobic
distance workouts for fat, sedentary adults might not be the best use of time
and energy for hockey players who need to develop skills and quickness.
What
has been missing in the development of American hockey players is that list of
priorities — most important ones at the top — because if we just turn our kids
over to an outside expert, the development will be compartmentalized at best. Worse yet, it will probably over-emphasize
that expert’s compartment. For some reason this has happened to hockey more
than any other sport. Imagine if Tiger
Woods would have been the victim of un-focused expert advice — if when he was a
youngster, he had to run distances, ride a stationary bike, lift weights,
balance on top of balls, train the core muscles individually — and go to
school. When all this was done, he could
work on golf skills.
Fortunately,
Tiger gained many of these qualities in an integrated, athletic way — playing
and practicing golf. Later he added
workouts for strength and endurance to his arsenal of skills.
The
first project in planning for development of hockey talent is to identify the
priorities. Make a list; and if skills and
athleticism are at the top, the next questions are important.
Can
aerobic endurance be gained while practicing for athleticism and hockey
skills? Strength training at a very
young age is obviously best done using body weight, doing athletic things like
sprinting, jumping, skating and playing other sports. Can strength training later during
adolescence also be done mostly outside the traditional weight room, working on
athletic qualities that are essential for hockey?
Are
core muscles being strengthened in the most effective way while we practice
hockey skills and athleticism? Or, while
participating in other sports? Are
balance, coordination, agility, and rhythm gained as well?
Compartmentalized
training is unlikely to result in a highly athletic, skillful hockey
player. Isolated strengthening of any
muscle — core muscles as well — is unlikely to enhance performance or reduce
injuries. The more
athletic the training, the more athletic the final product.
Separating
speed or agility workouts from hockey skills will increase the difficulty of
putting them together — quick hands and feet — in a package like Savard or
Ovechkin. Separate endurance workouts
make little sense, when endurance, skill, speed, strength, agility, balance,
and vision are all required in the same shift of every hockey game.
Look
closely at the young superstars of the NHL — their skills, athleticism, and
rink sense — and it is obvious where the time and
effort should be spent.